He looked at me. He sat and
thought for a moment. “History is a strange thing, Mr Dwyer.” He began. “There
is a famous quote, History is written by the winners,” he continued. I looked at him curiously. “You must
have realised by now, what you may read about, in non-fiction, will never be
the whole truth. It will always be someone else’s version. With descriptions of
battles for example, usually, it’s the person who didn’t lose at whatever
happened. Or, perhaps they were the person who was in the safest place, when
history actually happened. Perhaps it was written by someone, who held someone
else in very high regard and wanted them to be remembered.” He paused. “Did you
know there are no writings by the famous father of philosophy, Socrates?’ Then
possibly remembering I was only nine years old (even though we were well read
back then), He continued, “Well, you wouldn’t yet, But, he is only known to us,
by the writings of his students, such as Plato, and the later philosophers?
He had paused. I looked at him
for a moment. “So, perhaps Socrates didn’t actually exist, Sir”, I suggested,
almost forgetting why I was there.
Mr Walsh looked back at me
seriously. He considered what I said. “Perhaps. That could be argued, Mr Dwyer.
But, I am sure ‘a’ Socrates existed, in some form. It is through the history we
have of him, how he was written about, that we know ‘of’ him. Someone else of
course, may write about someone. (Had he foreseen this blog? I wonder if he had
ever dreamed a student of his would be writing about him) That is how history
is written, by the winners, or, the survivors.” He paused again and looked at
me. “Many ‘famous’ wars were, no doubt, very different at the time they were
fought. But when they took the time to write about them, they probably changed
one or two things to what suited them, the winners, to ‘tell’ the others. Other
things they simply hid by omission. Famous events in history are usually no different.
Someone wrote the history, sometimes a long time after the actual event.”
He paused and looked out the
window. I looked at his face seriously for the first time. He was old. Well,
older. Well, compared to we young students, he was very old (But I am sure, he
was younger then, than I am now). He was certainly an older man compared to
many of the other teachers. And how he managed his class was different to the
other teachers. He had a way of talking ‘to’ the students, rather than ‘at’ the
students, and he got their attention. He had my attention now. As I sat facing
him after he had obviously identified me as the thief. Then he continued.
“Things change over time. Such as the history, story or ‘the legend‘, that we
know and the actual reality that was ‘Robin of Locksley or….?”
“Robin Hood” I supplied.
‘Robin Hood” He replied.
“Exactly”.
(Continued tomorrow)
No comments:
Post a Comment