I know that I believe many of my father’s ideas on family
came from his own family experiences. Particularly, where we had sidetracked
(yet again! I hear you cry) from the tale of the anticipated punishment, I was
awaiting in my room. Just before we return to that, I will first finish the
current thread. It was his idea of family that was probably out of step with
his situation. He could have embraced the experiences of his children and
engaged with them. Sadly, in some circumstances he appeared to feel threatened
and challenged, even when no actual threat existed. And then he would step back
from that experience.
By way of example I look at the circumstance of his art.
(see blog 5th of June 2012) He had an interest, as we saw and had
evidence of in the house, of painting pictures. While admittedly he was no
great artist, it was obviously an interest he possessed. My next older sister
showed early signs of artistic potential, particularly, in the field of
painting. My father suddenly stopped. I do not know the entire reason why, but
he did not pick up a brush again until many years later, when he retired and
was living alone. He did not appear to see the engagement he could have had,
and the potential pleasure in watching and assisting in her development. My sister
is a very brilliant artist. Yet he separated himself from that joy of growth
and connection. Did he not know how to respond? It would appear so. I have a
family who between them can be described as creative in a wide variety of
fields. He could have been a part of any of them (Our mother certainly engaged
more with each of us and our interests). But for the greater part sadly, he
seemed not to have truly engaged in either the opportunity, or the available
experiences.
(Continued tomorrow)
No comments:
Post a Comment