Let it not be said that we did not judge the world, based
upon our personal experiences. That we examined what we saw, and thought, using
our environment and education. A true combination of the age-old argument for
‘Nuture versus Nature’. Both, were involved. You could say we were ‘nutured’ to
observe. And, with most of our family, to comment, on what we saw or thought.
It was a part of the ‘nature’ of our families’ make-up. Of course, that is not
what the argument of ‘Nurture versus Nature’ is about. How much happens due to
genetics, and what happens with the effect of the environment. It is probably
unfortunate that if evolution does have it right, that change, due to natural
environment is so slow. Otherwise, not only would I have developed the quick
mind I possessed, I may also have possessed the equally swift feet and legs.
Though, given that argument, my father would probably have developed extra-ordinary
long arms and very wide and hard surfaced hands (If you catch my drift).
The comment regarding my father’s age was entirely innocent.
Brief, and innocent. The aftermath was not. Despite the best efforts of my
mother, to ‘cajole’ my father (that it was not necessary to ‘ban him for life’
from the television), due to the accidental inference he had taken to my
comment. It was with what appeared to be great hurt, that my father told me to
leave the room. And felt the others in their laughter were scorning all he set
out to achieve. I was probably lucky it was late in the afternoon and raining,
so there were no specific tasks he would assign me to, but it was the regret I
felt later, reviewing what I had said, and understanding what had caused him to
feel some hurt.
The comment must have stirred some guilt in him. He was not
that old. Even now I am some twelve years older than he was at the time. I am
however very aware of the effect of which age is starting to affect my physical
body. But I am constantly doing something about it. Changing my diet, regular
exercise. I do not drink and have not had a cigarette in the last 14 years.
Perhaps, part of his guilt, raised by my remark, was based on the fact he did
not seem to consider these things. He had been raised differently, and as I
said to him on many occasions in the later years. “I wanted to change what was
wrong. I wanted to change what I had been shown, that I thought was wrong, and
do it differently”. There was always something to learn from the ‘Nurture’ side
of the debate.
(Continued tomorrow)
No comments:
Post a Comment