I had a teacher when I was
around nine years of age. A Mr Walsh. He taught me in my last two years of
primary school. For those of you in foreign countries, primary school went from
about 5 years of age, to around 11 years of age. Depending on your skills, you
may have been sent up an extra level of learning, or not. Since we could read
before we went to school, we jumped the first few levels much quicker than
others. So by the time we got to the last two years of primary school we were
younger than other children in the class.
Mr Walsh was a gentle spoken
man, with a wonderful sense of the love of learning. He understood that
questions needed to be answered and would take the time to do just that. He
also understood that one question should lead to another. This was the
underlying nature of true learning. Many of the teachers I had had, prior to Mr
Walsh, and unfortunately many after him, had simply taught. There is a real
difference. The nuns, for example, had especially their own way of getting you
to learn. Basically, drumming it into you. Not encouraging you to learn, but
drumming the same things they were taught, into you, the way they had been
shown. Repetition of information, without actual learning of the facts, or,
understanding of the lessons. Stifling the inquiring mind. Yes, I could parrot
most of what they had shown me. But I also learnt a lot about bad behaviour (by
them) and I still question the true moral behaviour of what some of them put me
through in the name of their religion. There were teachers who thought it
important to talk down to children. That was also frightening. Then there were
the teachers who couldn’t communicate, but just insisted that you copied the
lesson from the board as they wrote it. Word for word, verbatim, and
……..pointless. No engagement with the pupils, no engagement with the subject
they were meant to teach. And so they taught, but didn’t seem to care about the
outcome. I am sure we have all had such teachers.
(Continued tomorrow)
No comments:
Post a Comment