A phrase I have heard many
times is
“Those who can, do, Those
who can’t, teach.”
I disagree. If you can’t do,
and you teach, and, you’re a lousy teacher, isn’t that even worse? I prefer the
phrase,
“Teaching, without it, all
other trades are impossible”
That says a lot more. Yet it is
still assuming that the person imparting the necessary knowledge, is qualified
to do so, or, is going to do it in such a way as to encourage the person being
taught. Think about this. Why do some people become captivated by a chosen
field? And in many cases, go on to great achievement in that field. Most often,
it is likely because of an actual physical experience or an ‘engaged moment’,
where their curiosity was piqued, or they experienced a strong emotional
experience, which formed the connection between the subject and their future
involvement. Often it is by being introduced to the subject, by someone who
themselves is engaged, through full time occupational association or, through
strong hobbyist emphasis. In his book on manhood, Steve Biddulph (See blog
October 3rd 2012) mentions the
garages around the country where, in the evenings, many men (and women) can be
found engaging in their hobby, which is put to one side in their responsibility
to simply provide income. But how many could possibly have done their hobby as
a job, if, they had been engaged by the right teacher.
I have experienced the entire
gamut of teaching standards, as I have attended a large number and wide variety
of schools, some colleges, a university or two (as a student and as a teacher)
and more importantly, Life, over the many years I have moved around. I have witnessed
the methods from those driven by religious zeal (potentially misguided when it
comes to imparting other real knowledge), Immoral headmasters, and self
promoting idiots (actually that was the same person), those driven to the very
edges of psychotic breakdowns (and, one or two that literally went over the
edge while teaching us), to the most engaging and enthralling teachers who
raised your interest beyond the simple words and curriculum. Yet the balance of
the great teachers, is the far more minor percentage of that list. Is that why,
when I finally encountered one, they were so influential to me?
(Continued tomorrow)
No comments:
Post a Comment