However, this started as a
thread about wealth and the hanger-oners (hangers on?) Those who circle the
wealthy (or apparent wealthy), like the famous Remora fish who attaches itself
to sharks, or swims with them, picking up the fragments dropped in their
frenzied feedings. Why I mentioned the hangers on, was from the actions of a
few who swung in the orbit of the twins ‘E’&’K’. How they behaved towards
others, around the brothers, seeking their approval and using the arrogance of
‘E’ & ‘K’ to promote themselves. It was from such behaviour that I affected
my relationship to Mr Walsh. It was a simple matter. And came about through the
‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’scenario. Did you ever read ‘The Sneetches’ by Dr Seuss?
The tale of the star bellied Sneetches and the non star bellied Sneetches? How
each wanted what the other had, or didn’t have. How one group lauded over the
other unnecessarily. Well, such was the behaviour of the brothers, emphasised
by the hangers on.
To finally explain. It was
standard for us (the Dwyer family) to have our lunches made at home for school.
Cheese and Vegemite sandwich the standard. Buying a lunch was a very special
treat, sometimes occurring once a fortnight (though rarely), or if major store
issues occurred over a weekend, then sometimes on a Monday. There was no
guarantee, so, it was not surprising that we did not come to school with
amounts of cash for spending. We came to school with our lunches, and even if
ordering a ‘shop bought’ one, we were on very limited in budget. We had to have
a very clear idea of what a small pie cost, or a snack. And if four, five or
later six children were requiring lunches, and asked for money, it was divided,
not multiplied. So we were known to be cashless at school. This assisted in
making several ‘better off ‘(financially) students, such as ‘E’& ‘K,’ to
feel we were beneath them. This also encouraged their hangers-on, to acclaim
our ‘poor status and laud it over us.
(Continued tomorrow)
No comments:
Post a Comment